Log in to your Document360 account to give feedback

Feature Request

Preserve Internal Article Links within Exported Documentation
Based on an earlier FR, Doc360 exports now support table of contents linking and allow entire categories, including subcategories and nested articles, to be exported together. The linking works as expected for navigation from the TOC. --- The issue arises with links inside the exported articles themselves. When one article in the export links to another article that is already included in the same export, the link does not navigate to that article within the exported file. Instead, it redirects users to the KB Help Center version of the article. This breaks the offline or self-contained nature of the export. If all referenced articles are already part of the export, internal cross-references should resolve within the exported document, not redirect to an external URL. Redirecting to online help is reasonable for links that point to: External websites such as Microsoft documentation. Articles in categories that are not included in the export. However, for links between articles that are already included under the same exported category or subcategory, the expected behavior is internal navigation within the exported file. --- For exports that include multiple related articles, we want: Cross-links between those articles are internalized automatically. Clicking a link should jump to the corresponding section or article within the export. External redirection to only occur when the target content is not part of the export. This ensures the export remains usable as a standalone document and supports offline consumption without loss of navigation context. --- PS: The export referred to here is PDF, not HTML export. The FR referenced is https://feedback.document360.com/feature-request/p/pdf-export-enhancements
0
·
Content Tools
Missing important elements (TOC, Attachments, Navigation, Glossary) in offline HTML export
A bunch of our customers rely on offline documentation especially for airgapped environments, but the current offline docs are missing some of the basic capabilities that are severely impacting the customer experience and the ability to use the docs Priority item # 1 - Missing Table of Contents / left side navigation The offline documentation does not include a left-side Table of Contents or say the side navigation. Without a TOC, customers have no visibility into: What other articles exist within the same folder How content is organized How to navigate between related topics This results in a very poor user experience, as customers are forced to rely on direct links or guesswork instead of structured navigation. A TOC is fundamental to any documentation experience, especially offline, where internet access is already not available. Must have requirement: Include the same TOC/navigation in the left sidebar for offline documentation as in the online documentation Priority item # 2 - Missing Attachment Support Offline documentation currently does not support attachments. This is a huge turn off for customers accessing the docs in airgapped environments where there is no internet access to download attachments online. If an article contains an attachment, Document360 should be able to: Download the attachment as part of the export process Package it with the offline documentation Allow customers to access the attachment locally This is a reasonable and expected behavior for offline documentation and is critical for customers who rely on supplementary files. Must have requirement: Automatically include article attachments in offline exports and ensure they are accessible locally. Priority item # 3 - Other Enhancements (Low Priority) Some other important items that can be considered secondary include adding previous and next buttons, glossary items, and breadcrumbs. Currently, the TOC and attachment support are the most critical blockers.
1
·
Import & Export
Track Resource for Documented Workflow within the Tool
In Doc360, there are several places where a certain action like creating a redirect rule or fixing a broken link does not show the person responsible for performing that action. Now there are two reasons; accountability and record keeping. We have multiple apps within our software and each is suited to a different category of customers. To cater to that, internal resources are accordingly assigned to deliver the best possible documentation experience. Often there is overlap between resources and when two or more teams work together, mistakes can occur. Following areas are without any visible resource tracking: 'URL Mapping' in Knowledge base widget 'Article redirect rules' in Site builder 'Style guide' in Site builder 'Variables' in Content tools 'Snippets' in Content tools 'Glossary' in Content tools For Glossary, we're already awaiting a Category-based glossary implementation, but to not able to sort via 'Last Modified by' or 'Created by', etc. makes the job very cumbersome. Similarly: 'Import and export project' in Content tools 'Export to PDF' in Content tools 'Manage links' in Analytics While Team auditing is available, however it's a global setting to monitor any compliance issues. We request you extend the existing functionality to the areas above. 'Templates' in Content tools Recycle bin Audit trail functionality at the article level The ask is a genuine business use case of 'who did what.' Tl;dr: Add a column 'Last Modified by' / 'Created by' to aforesaid settings/config pages.
0
·
Infrastructure
Load More