One of the standard, out-of-the-box roles should be "Reader" or "Read Only"
under review
C
Charcoal grey Wombat
"Reader" or "Read Only" should be a standard out-of-the-box role, not one you have to customize. It would make way more sense than "None", by the way.
Photo Viewer
View photos in a modal
Log In
M
Magnificent Grasshopper
marked this post as
under review
M
Magnificent Grasshopper
Charcoal grey Wombat I believe the screenshot shared for references is taken while trying to create team accounts, however we do not have this workflow of choosing role while we create readers. At the moment, we do not have the option to include additional roles in our system.
Photo Viewer
View photos in a modal
C
Charcoal grey Wombat
Magnificent Grasshopper I'm not talking about readers, I'm talking about a role that allows the team account to read (to view, to see) the content inside a project or workspace, but not to change anything.
My issue is that I have two workspaces (kb1 and kb2) and some team accounts should only be able to edit content on one of them (kb2), so I set them up as "Editor", then selected the kb2 workspace. Problem is, this person can no longer see the other workspace (kb1). I need them to see everything, but edit only one workspace.
Support told me to create a custom role, but that's an enterprise feature and I don't have the enterprise edition. I don't want to create two accounts for this person, one as a team member and another one as a reader, and it seems logical to have a "Viewer" role in addition to "None", "Editor" and "Draft writer".