Ability to archive articles
under review
U
Umbral green Woodpecker
Often, we need to take down articles, but we also need to be able to retrieve them later... and go back to it. So the ability to archive content is pretty important.
Log In
D
D360 Product Management
marked this post as
under review
P
Physical Toad
Just to comment that I need this feature very badly. Do you have a timeline?
D
Document360 Engineering
marked this post as
in progress
M
Magnificent Grasshopper
Merged in a post:
Add Archive Feature
T
Thundering Ocelot
Old articles need a place to be saved but totally inactive. This would free up tags and other issues. Companies need to keep what was previously published.
M
Magnificent Grasshopper
Thundering Ocelot we do have this item in our upcoming 2024 roadmap. Thanks for your suggestion.
U
Umbral green Woodpecker
Though we are using the import/export function as a workaround, I realized that the history of the page doesn't get captured. So Please keep in mind that we will need the page history to be intact when archiving an article.
M
Magnificent Grasshopper
Merged in a post:
We need an Archive bucket greater than 100 articles
T
Thundering Ocelot
Most companies need to archive vs. delete pages. The folders are limited to 100 files and that is not enough to create an archive. I hit this wall and the pop up was not in my face enough to see and as a result there are likely files that did not get in the archive bucket.
H
Hazel Puffin
This is essential for processes which update frequently.
C
Continental Mandrill
Agree, this is very important for our organization as it relates to content management.
B
Bastille Minnow
This is a hugely important part of any content management workflow. Looking forward to this being prioritized sooner than later.
Load More
→